抗癫痫药物的联合使用:是否新型药物的应用改变了临床结局?

Antiepileptic drug combinations--have newer agents altered clinical outcomes?
期刊: EPIDEMIOL REV2012年12月期卷

In 2000, 332 (20.5%) of 1617 patients registered with the Western Infirmary Epilepsy Unit required antiepileptic drug (AED) polytherapy to remain seizure-free for at least 1 year. The analysis was repeated 10 years later. Of 2379 seizure-free patients, 20.4% (n=486 - 254 women, 232 men, aged 18-95 years [median age 49 years]) were receiving combination therapy. Two AEDs were taken by 395 (81.3%) patients in 2010, and by 287 (86.4%) in 2000. Sodium valproate with lamotrigine was the commonest of 64 successful pairings. As a combination, mean daily doses of both AEDs were lower (n=96; sodium valproate 1200 mg, lamotrigine 155 mg) than when sodium valproate was taken with carbamazepine or levetiracetam (n=42; 1621 mg; p<0.001), and lamotrigine was combined with topiramate or levetiracetam (n=33; 430 mg; p<0.001), suggesting possible synergism. In 2010, a higher percentage of patients (n=85) remained seizure-free on 3 AEDs (17.5% in 2010, 12.7% in 2000) in 57 separate regimens. Only 0.9% (n=3) of patients in 2000, and 1.2% (n=6) in 2010 responded to 4 AEDs. Levetiracetam (n=109; 10.2%) and topiramate (n=81; 7.6%) were the newer agents most commonly represented in successful combinations. These data tend to imply that drug substitution rather than addition has largely led to these marginally improved results. In the last decade, when used as adjunctive therapies, newer agents appear not to have impacted substantially on the likelihood of producing seizure freedom. An alternative approach to AED development may be required to change this disappointing scenario.
 

学科代码:神经病学 药学   关键词:antiepileptic_drugs
来源: 国际医学期刊
国际医学期刊介绍:信息来自于Pubmed,包括超过2100万出处生物医学文献来自Medline、生命科学期刊、在线书籍。引用内容链接到全文内容、公共医学中心和出版商的网站。 马上访问国际医学期刊网站http://www.pubmed.com/
顶一下(0
您可能感兴趣的文章
    发表评论网友评论(0)
      发表评论
      登录后方可发表评论,点击此处登录