急诊科中困难的气道管理:GlideScope视频喉镜与直接喉镜的比较

Difficult airway management in the emergency department: GlideScope videolaryngoscopy compared to direct laryngoscopy
作者:Mosier, J...M..., Stolz, U..., Chiu, S... 【View at publisher】 【全球专家评论】
期刊: J Emerg Med2012年11月期42卷 专家评级: 循证评级:B

Background:

Videolaryngoscopy has become a popular method of intubation in the Emergency Department (ED), however, little research has compared this technique with direct laryngoscopy (DL).

Objective:

To compare the success rates of GlideScope (Verathon Inc., Bothell, WA) videolaryngoscopy (GVL) and DL in emergent airways with known difficult airway predictors (DAPs).

Methods:

We evaluated 772 consecutive ED intubations over a 23-month period. After each intubation, the physician completed a data collection form that included: demographics, DAPs, Cormack-Lehane view, optical clarity, lens contamination, and complications. DAPs included: cervical immobility, obesity, small mandible, large tongue, short neck, blood or vomit in the airway, tracheal edema, secretions, and facial or neck trauma. Primary outcome was first-attempt success rates. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate the odds of failure for DL compared to GVL.

Results:

First-attempt success rate with DL was 68%, GVL 78% (Fisher's exact test, p=0.001). Adjusted odds of success of GVL compared to DL on first attempt equals 2.20 (odds ratio [OR] 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.51–3.19). After statistically controlling for DAPs, GVL was more likely to succeed on first attempt than DL (OR 3.07, 95% CI 2.19–4.30). Logistic regression of DAPs showed that the presence of blood, small mandible, obesity, and a large tongue were statistically significant risk factors for decreasing the odds of success with DL and increasing the odds of success of GVL.

Conclusion:

For difficult airways with the presence of blood or small mandible, or a large tongue or obesity, GVL had a higher success rate at first attempt than DL.

学科代码:呼吸病学 重症监护   关键词:急诊科中困难的气道管理
来源: Eclips
Eclips介绍:Eclips由权威专家阅读世界顶级医学期刊(包括New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, JAMA, BMJ 等)后筛选出最顶尖的文章,并总结、分级和点评,为繁忙的临床医生提供最快、最有效的前沿医学信息,并同时提供临床医生参与点评文献和同行互动交流的学术平台。 请点击申请试用并填写联系信息,我们将每月为前100位申请者发送带有用户名、密码及网页链接的电子邮件,请您注意查收!感谢您的参与及使用! 马上访问Eclips网站http://eclips.consult.com/
顶一下(0
您可能感兴趣的文章
    发表评论网友评论(0)
      发表评论
      登录后方可发表评论,点击此处登录