高级搜索
立即登录 | 免费注册
当前位置 >   首页 > 医药资讯 >  医学资讯  > 医学资讯内容

两项长期乳腺放疗试验在放疗是否会增加二次恶性肿瘤风险上意见相左

Long-Term Breast Radiotherapy Trials at Odds Over Risk of Second Malignancies

BY SARA FREEMAN 2010-10-07 【发表评论】
中文 | ENGLISH | 打印| 推荐给好友
Elsevier Global Medical News
Breaking News 爱思唯尔全球医学资讯
最新进展

BARCELONA (EGMN) – Although the risk of locoregional recurrence is undoubtedly reduced by the use of radiotherapy, uncertainty remains over the risk of second malignancies resulting from such treatment, according to two studies presented at the biennial meeting of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiation and Oncology.

New long-term data from the Stockholm mastectomy trial confirm that a major reduction in locoregional recurrence can be achieved with adjuvant radiotherapy of the breast, with no increased risk of contralateral or second malignancies.

Data from the European ALLEGRO project show, however, that the 20-year risk of second primary malignancies is higher in irradiated vs. nonirradiated women, with sites near the delivery of radiation being the most affected.

The Stockholm Mastectomy Trial

Radiotherapy is associated with a threefold decrease in the risk of locoregional recurrence in breast cancer, “but there is concern about the potential increase in non–breast cancer mortality,” said Dr. Rodrigo Arriagada, professor of oncology-pathology at the Karolinska Institute and University Hospital, Stockholm.

Dr. Arriagada presented findings from a median of 32 years’ follow-up of the Stockholm mastectomy trial in which 960 women with breast cancer were treated with pre- or postoperative radiotherapy or with modified radical mastectomy alone. Patients in the trial were recruited in 1971-1976, and those who received radiotherapy were treated with doses of 45 Gy given in 25 fractions over a 5-week period (J. Clin. Oncol. 1995;13:2869-78). The Swedish Tumor Registry reported second malignancies systematically.

When women in the radiotherapy arms were compared with those who were given no radiotherapy, the hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.90 (P = .16) and the HR for event-free survival was 0.79 (P less than .001). Locoregional recurrence was significantly reduced (HR, 0.29; P less than .001), with a nonsignificant trend for fewer distant metastases (HR, 0.87; P = .18) with radiotherapy vs. no radiotherapy.

In node-positive patients given radiotherapy, the hazard ratios for locoregional recurrence (0.24; P less than .0001) and distant metastases (0.65; P = .009) were significant. The HR for overall death in node-positive patients was 0.82 (P = .17).

Considering all patients, the risks of contralateral breast cancer and second malignancies were not significantly different between the patients who had received pre- or postoperative radiotherapy and those who had mastectomy alone.

“Adjuvant radiotherapy significantly decreases the risk of locoregional recurrences,” Dr. Arriagada said. “In high-risk patients with positive nodes, it may also decrease the incidence of distant metastases, and then have a positive impact on overall survival.”

Although later side effects, such as cardiovascular complications, may compromise the potential overall survival benefit, Dr. Arriagada concluded that long-term follow-up of oncology trials is essential in order to obtain complete information on likely complications of therapy.

The ALLEGRO Project

“The ALLEGRO project aims to address many of the early and late health risks to normal health tissue from the use of existing and emerging techniques in radiation therapy,” Trine Grantzau, a Ph.D. candidate from Aarhus (Denmark) University Hospital, said at the meeting. She noted that ALLEGRO involves collaboration by 13 institutions in eight European countries.

Linking data supplied by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group to the Danish Cancer Registry, the investigators were able to identify 47,518 women who were treated for early breast cancer in 1982-2007 and for whom follow-up data at 1 year after diagnosis were available. Of these, 24,316 had received postoperative radiotherapy whereas the remaining 23,202 had not.

In all, 2,958 second primary malignancies occurred, of which 1,187 were potentially related to the use of postoperative radiotherapy. Second malignancies occurred in a variety of locations, but mostly affected the respiratory, digestive, or genitourinary organs.

“All of these sites are within or close to the treatment field,” Ms. Grantzau said. “We have selected these sites out of an a priori assumption that these sites have received [radiotherapy] doses that could be potentially carcinogenic.”

Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated for second primary cancers occurring from the 1-year follow-up to 20 or more years post diagnosis. The SIR “estimates the occurrence of cancer in a cohort relative to what would be expected in the general population – in this case, the general female Danish population,” the investigator explained.

For all 47,518 women who were identified as 1-year cancer survivors, SIRs at 1-4, 10-14, and 20 or more years after a breast cancer diagnosis were 1.0, 1.3, and 1.3, respectively. The respective SIRs for these time points for the nonirradiated women were 1.0, 1.2, and 1.2, and for the irradiated women were 1.0, 1.5, and 1.8. The difference in SIRs at 20 or more years following diagnosis between irradiated and nonirradiated women did not reach statistical significance (P = .08).

However, when SIRs for potentially radiotherapy-induced vs. nonpotentially radiotherapy-induced sites were compared, significant differences for irradiated vs. nonirradiated women were observed at 10-14 years (1.6 vs. 1.2; P = .03) and 20 or more years (2.6 vs. 0.9; P = .001).

SIRs for various tumor sites were also compared, showing that at 20 or more years after breast cancer diagnosis, irradiated women had a higher SIR ratio for second lung, bronchus, and tracheal malignancies than did the nonirradiated women, at 4.3 vs. 0.7 (P = .0001). Higher SIRs were seen for esophageal and colorectal cancers as well, but the differences did not reach statistical significance.

“There is an increased risk of developing potentially induced cancer, and the risk increases over time since treatment,” Ms. Grantzau said. The ALLEGRO project team will now use a dose-planning system to identify the radiation levels associated with the increased risk.

ALLEGRO is funded under the EURATOM Work Program. Dr. Arriagada and Ms. Grantzau reported no conflicts of interest.

Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Global Medical News. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

巴塞罗那(EGMN)——虽然已明确放疗可以降低肿瘤局部复发的风险,但根据两年一度的欧洲放射治疗学和肿瘤学学会上报道的两项研究结果,放疗是否可能增加二次恶性肿瘤发生的风险依然不能确定。斯德哥尔摩乳房切除试验的长期随访数据显示,乳腺辅助放疗可显著降低局部复发风险,但不增加对侧乳腺肿瘤或二次恶性肿瘤的风险。而欧洲ALLEGRO计划的研究数据显示,与未行放疗的妇女相比,放疗的妇女二次原发性恶性肿瘤的20年发生风险更高,放疗邻近部位受影响最大。
 
斯德哥尔摩乳房切除试验
 
瑞典卡罗林斯卡研究所及大学医院肿瘤病理学教授Rodrigo Arriagada报告了斯德哥尔摩乳房切除试验的结果。此试验包含了960例进行术前或术后放疗或仅行改良根治性乳房切除术的乳腺癌患者,入组时间1971~1976年,中位随访时间32年,接受放疗者的放射剂量为45 Gy,在5周内接受了25次放疗(J. Clin. Oncol. 1995;13:2869-78)
 
研究结果显示,与未行放疗者相比,放疗妇女的总生存风险比(HR)0.90(P=0.16),无病生存的HR0.79(P<0.001),局部复发率显著下降(HR=0.29P<0.001),远处转移的风险有下降趋势但没有统计学意义(HR=0.87P=0.18)。淋巴结阳性的放疗患者局部复发的HR0.24(P<0.0001),远处转移的HR0.65(P=0.009),总死亡率的HR0.82(P=0.17)。对于全部入组患者来说,对侧乳腺癌及二次恶性肿瘤的发生风险在接受术前、术后放疗及仅行乳房切除术的患者间差异没有统计学意义。
 
研究结果表明,辅助放疗可明显降低局部复发的风险,对于淋巴结阳性的高危患者,放疗有可能减少远处转移风险,从而降低总死亡率。
 
ALLEGRO研究
 
ALLEGO研究是由8个欧洲国家的13个研究所合作完成,其目的是探讨成熟及新兴的放疗技术的使用对正常健康组织的短期及长期影响。根据丹麦肿瘤登记处丹麦乳腺癌协作组提供的资料,ALLEGO研究最终入组47,518例在1982~2007年间接受治疗的早期乳腺癌患者,她们均有确诊后1年的随访资料。其中24,316例接受了术后放疗,其余23,202例未接受放疗。
 
丹麦奥尔胡斯大学医院的Trine Grantzau报告了研究结果。共2,958例发生了二次原发性恶性肿瘤,其中1,187例可能与术后放疗有关。二次恶性肿瘤可发生在多个部位,但主要累及呼吸道、消化道及泌尿生殖系。研究中,所有的二次恶性肿瘤发生在放疗区域内或邻近区域。
 
ALLEGO计划的研究者计算了患者确诊后1~20年或更长随访时间的二次原发性肿瘤的标准化发生率(SIRs)。对于入组的全部1年生存的47,518例来说,乳腺癌确诊后1~410~14>20年随访的SIRs分别为1.01.31.3;未接受放疗的患者上述时间点的SIRs分别为1.01.21.2,接受放疗者的SIRs分别为1.01.51.8。对于>20年随访的情况,接受及未接受放疗的SIRs差异尚无统计学意义(P = 0.08),但当比较放疗潜在致癌部位与非放疗潜在致癌部位的SIRs时发现,放疗与非放疗女性在10~14年随访(1.6 vs. 1.2P =0.03)>20年随访时(2.6 vs. 0.9 P = 0.001)差异有统计学意义。研究者还比较了不同部位的SIRs,结果显示,与未经放疗的患者相比,确诊乳腺癌后随访>20年患者组的肺部、支气管、气管的二次恶性肿瘤的SIRs明显偏高(4.3 vs. 0.7 P = 0.0001)。食管和结直肠癌的SIRs也增加,但尚未达到有统计学意义。
 
研究结果表明,放疗增加二次肿瘤的发病风险,并且随着放疗后时间的增加,肿瘤发生风险增加。
 
ALLEGRO研究由欧洲原子能共同体工作计划(EURATOM Work Program)资助。Arriagada博士和Grantzau女士均未声明他们各自的研究有利益冲突。
 
爱思唯尔  版权所有

Subjects:
oncology, OncologyEX, womans_health
学科代码:
肿瘤学, 妇产科学

请登录后发表评论, 点击此处登录。

病例分析 <span class="ModTitle_Intro_Right" id="EPMI_Home_MedicalCases_Intro_div" onclick="javascript:window.location='http://www.elseviermed.cn/tabid/127/Default.aspx'" onmouseover="javascript:document.getElementById('EPMI_Home_MedicalCases_Intro_div').style.cursor='pointer';document.getElementById('EPMI_Home_MedicalCases_Intro_div').style.textDecoration='underline';" onmouseout="javascript:document.getElementById('EPMI_Home_MedicalCases_Intro_div').style.textDecoration='none';">[栏目介绍]</span>  病例分析 [栏目介绍]

 王燕燕 王曙

上海交通大学附属瑞金医院内分泌科

患者,女,69岁。2009年1月无明显诱因下出现乏力,当时程度较轻,未予以重视。2009年3月患者乏力症状加重,尿色逐渐加深,大便习惯改变,颜色变淡。4月18日入我院感染科治疗,诉轻度头晕、心慌,体重减轻10kg。无肝区疼痛,无发热,无腹痛、腹泻、腹胀、里急后重,无恶性、呕吐等。入院半月前于外院就诊,查肝功能:ALT 601IU/L,AST 785IU/L,TBIL 97.7umol/L,白蛋白 41g/L,甲状腺功能:游离T3 30.6pmol/L,游离T4 51.9pmol/L,心电图示快速房颤。
 

疾病资源中心  疾病资源中心
医学数据库  医学数据库



友情链接:中文版柳叶刀 | MD CONSULT | Journals CONSULT | Procedures CONSULT | eClips CONSULT | Imaging CONSULT | 论文吧 | 世界医学书库 医心网 | 前沿医学资讯网

公司简介 | 用户协议 | 条件与条款 | 隐私权政策 | 网站地图 | 联系我们

 互联网药品信息服务资格证书 | 卫生局审核意见通知书 | 药监局行政许可决定书 
电信与信息服务业务经营许可证 | 京ICP证070259号 | 京ICP备09068478号

Copyright © 2009 Elsevier.  All Rights Reserved.  爱思唯尔版权所有