高级搜索
立即登录 | 免费注册
当前位置 >   首页 > 医药资讯 >  药品动态  > 药品资讯内容

联用布地奈德口服液+PPI治疗嗜酸性食管炎患者疗效优于单用PPI

Oral Budesonide With PPI Beats PPI Alone for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

2010-08-05 【发表评论】
中文 | ENGLISH | 打印| 推荐给好友


Oral viscous budesonide in combination with lansoprazole was significantly more effective for pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis than was the proton pump inhibitor alone, reported Dr. Ranjan Dohil and his colleagues in an article appearing in the August issue of Gastroenterology.

Although patients with negative allergy testing appeared to respond better, “patients testing positive do also respond and should also be considered for OVB [oral viscous budesonide] therapy,” the authors concluded, based on their randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (Gastroenterology 2010 August [doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.05.001].

According to Dr. Dohil of the University of California, San Diego Medical Center, the symptoms of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) are similar to those seen in gastroesophageal reflux disease but the condition is “often refractory to acid-suppression therapy,” and therefore “the optimal therapy for EoE is unclear.”

The current phase II study, sponsored by the maker of OVB, Meritage Pharma Inc., is the first placebo-controlled study to evaluate the drug, which is a viscous liquid consisting of budesonide nebulizer suspension (Pulmicort respules, made by AstraZeneca PLC) mixed with sucralose (Splenda, McNeil Nutritionals, LLC).

Dr. Dohil and colleagues studied 31 children diagnosed with EoE between February 2008 and July 2009; a total of 24 completed the study and were included in the analysis. All had esophageal eosinophil counts greater than or equal to 20 eosinophils/high-powered field (eos/hpf) except for one patient, who had “panesophageal furrowing and exudates on endoscopy but a peak eosinophil count of 15” – this patient was also enrolled.

A total of 20 patients were male, and the mean age was 7.8 years (with a range of 1-17 years).

Of the total 24 children, 15 received OVB and PPI and 9 received placebo and PPI. “Subjects less than 5 feet tall received OVB 1 mg and those greater than or equal to 5 feet tall received OVB 2 mg” every day for 3 months, wrote the authors. The dose of lansoprazole was 15 mg twice daily for children younger than 10 years, and 30 mg twice daily for children aged 10 years and older.

In the treatment group, the mean peak eosinophil count prior to OVB/PPI therapy was 66.6 eos/hpf. After 3 months of therapy, it had decreased significantly to 4.8 eos/hpf (P = .0001), with only one patient classified as a complete nonresponder (the eosinophil count went from 67 to 47 eos/hpf in that patient).

Moreover, the results were seen throughout the esophagus. Indeed, “87% of OVB post-treatment patients [had] less than or equal to 6 eos/hpf in the distal esophageal biopsies and 100% [had] less than or equal to 6 eos/hpf in proximal esophageal biopsies,” wrote the authors.

In contrast, among patients treated with placebo plus the PPI, the mean eosinophil count went from 83.9 to 65.6 eos/hpf, and all patients were classified as nonresponders except for one partial responder, whose counts fell from 75 to 7.

The mean endoscopy score, determined at 3 months, decreased in the OVB group from 4.6 (range 0-9) before treatment to 1.5 (range 0-7) after treatment (P = .0005). The endoscopy score had a maximum value of 15 and was modified from the Endoscopy Scoring Tool (EST), which has been used to differentiate EoE from gastroesophageal reflux disease. No patients in the OVB group were found to have any esophageal strictures.

In comparison, among the placebo patients the mean endoscopy score improved from 7.8 (range 4-9) before treatment to 5.4 (range 1-9) after treatment (P =.041) but “none of the endoscopy scores completely normalized.” One placebo group patient also had an esophageal stricture.

The authors also found that children without allergies did typically respond better to the OVB therapy: 100% of the nine children in the treatment group who had negative allergy scores were responders. In contrast, among the six remaining children who tested positive for allergies or asthma and received OVB, only four were complete responders.

“One was a partial responder and the other a nonresponder,” wrote Dr. Dohil. “The nonresponder and partial responder were older, taller, male allergic children (aged 15 and 17 years, respectively) who returned 30% of [their] study drug vial unopened.”

The authors conceded that the study’s duration of 3 months did not allow for long-term follow-up. However, “data from this study does support the need for a proprietary OVB medication specifically for the treatment of EoE,” they concluded.

In addition to receiving funding from the maker of OVB, Dr. Dohil and two other researchers disclosed having a financial interest in the successful development and marketing of OVB. They also disclosed that the University of California, San Diego, where the investigators are employed, has a financial interest in Meritage Pharma.

Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Global Medical News. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Ranjan Dohil博士及其同事在发表于《胃肠病学》(Gastroenterology)8月刊上的一篇文章中报告说,联用布地奈德口服液和兰索拉唑治疗小儿嗜酸性食管炎比单用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)明显更为有效。

 
基于他们所进行的一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验(Gastroenterology 2010 August [doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.05.001],作者总结说,尽管该疗法对过敏试验结果呈阴性的患者疗效更佳,“但其对过敏试验呈阳性的患者同样有效,所以,也应考虑对这些患者应用布地奈德口服液(OVB)治疗”。
 
据加州大学圣地亚哥医学中心的Dohil博士介绍,嗜酸性食管炎(EoE)的相关症状与我们在胃食管反流病中所观察到的症状类似,“但抑酸治疗通常对该疾病无效,因此,目前我们尚未确定EoE的最佳疗法。”
 
目前进行的这项II期研究由OVB的制造商Meritage制药公司赞助,该研究是对该药进行评估的首项安慰剂对照研究,该药是由布地奈德雾化混悬液(普米克令舒,由阿斯利康制药公司生产)与三氯蔗糖(Splenda,麦克尼尔营养品有限责任公司)混合而成的一种黏性液体。
 
Dohil博士及其同事共计研究了31例儿童,这些儿童被确诊患EoE的时间介于2008年2月~2009年7月之间;共有24例患者完成了这一研究,研究者利用他们的数据进行了分析。所有患者的食管嗜酸性粒细胞计数均≥20个嗜酸性粒细胞/高倍视野(eos/hpf),只有1例患者例外,该患者“整个食管表面都呈现沟状病变,内镜检查显示有分泌液渗出,但其嗜酸性粒细胞计数最大值仅为15”,该患者也被研究者纳入研究。
 
男性患者共有20例,平均年龄为7.8岁(介于1~17岁)。
 
作者们写道,在全部24例儿童中,有15例接受了OVB+PPI治疗,还有9例接受了安慰剂+PPI治疗。“身高<5英尺和身高≥5英尺的受试者服用OVB的剂量分别为1 mg/d和2 mg/d,服药时间为3个月”。兰索拉唑的给药剂量在年龄<10岁的儿童中为每次15 mg,每日2次,在年龄≥10岁的儿童中为每次30 mg,每日2次。
 
对治疗组患者而言,在接受OVB/PPI治疗前,其嗜酸性粒细胞计数最大值的平均数为66.6 eos/hpf。在3个月的治疗过后,该数值显著降低,仅为4.8 eos/hpf(P=0.0001),仅有1例患者被界定为治疗完全无效(该患者的嗜酸性粒细胞计数值从67降至47 eos/hpf)。
 
作者写道,此外,对各段食管所进行的检查均发现了同一结果。实际上,“在接受OVB治疗后,研究者通过远端食管活检发现,有87%患者的嗜酸性粒细胞计数值≤6 eos/hpf,而近端食管活检的结果表明,所有患者的嗜酸性粒细胞计数值均≤6 eos/hpf”。
 
相比之下,对使用安慰剂+PPI进行治疗的患者而言,其平均嗜酸性粒细胞计数值从83.9降至65.6 eos/hpf,在应用该疗法的所有患者中,除了其中1位患者取得部分疗效外(该患者的计数值从75降至7),其余所有患者均被划入治疗无效的范畴。
 
在治疗3月后,研究者对患者的平均内镜下评分进行了测定,其中OVB组患者从治疗前的4.6分(分数范围介于0~9分)下降至治疗后的1.5分(分数范围介于0~7分,P =0.0005)。患者的内镜评分最大值为15分,研究者采用内镜评分工具(EST)对其进行了修改,该工具被研究者用于对EoE和胃食管反流病进行鉴别诊断。研究未发现OVB组患者出现任何形式的食管狭窄。
 
相比之下,安慰剂组患者的平均内镜得分从治疗前的7.8分(分数范围介于4~9分)下降至治疗后的5.4分(分数范围介于1~9分,P =0.041),但“没有一例患者的内镜评分完全达标”。安慰剂组还有1例患者出现了食管狭窄。
 
作者们还发现,通常来说,对不存在过敏症状的儿童而言,OVB治疗的效果确实更佳:其对治疗组过敏评分呈阴性的9例儿童100%有效。相比之下,对过敏检测呈阳性或患有哮喘的余下6例儿童而言, OVB治疗仅对其中的4例患者完全有效。
 
Dohil 博士写道:“应用该疗法对其中1例患者产生了部分疗效,对另1例患者则完全无效,应用该疗法无效和部分有效的患者是更年长、高大,且过敏检测呈阳性的男孩(年龄分别为15岁和17岁),他们退回了分发给他们的30%的研究药物(药瓶未开封)。
 
作者们承认,该研究仅持续3个月,因而无法进行长期随访。他们总结说,然而,“该研究的数据确实表明,我们需要一种专用于治疗EoE的OVB专利药。”
 
除了接受过OVB制造商的研究经费外,Dohil博士及其他两位研究者还披露说,成功研发并销售OVB类药物会给他们带来经济利益。他们还披露说,圣地亚哥加州大学(这些研究人员供职于该机构)与Meritage制药公司存在经济利益关系。
 
爱思唯尔版权所有

 


Subjects:
general_primary, gastroenterology
学科代码:
内科学, 消化病学

请登录后发表评论, 点击此处登录。

疾病资源中心  疾病资源中心
 病例分析

 王燕燕 王曙

上海交通大学附属瑞金医院内分泌科

患者,女,69岁。2009年1月无明显诱因下出现乏力,当时程度较轻,未予以重视。2009年3月患者乏力症状加重,尿色逐渐加深,大便习惯改变,颜色变淡。4月18日入我院感染科治疗,诉轻度头晕、心慌,体重减轻10kg。无肝区疼痛,无发热,无腹痛、腹泻、腹胀、里急后重,无恶性、呕吐等。入院半月前于外院就诊,查肝功能:ALT 601IU/L,AST 785IU/L,TBIL 97.7umol/L,白蛋白 41g/L,甲状腺功能:游离T3 30.6pmol/L,游离T4 51.9pmol/L,心电图示快速房颤。
 

医学数据库  医学数据库



友情链接:中文版柳叶刀 | MD CONSULT | Journals CONSULT | Procedures CONSULT | eClips CONSULT | Imaging CONSULT | 论文吧 | 世界医学书库 医心网 | 前沿医学资讯网

公司简介 | 用户协议 | 条件与条款 | 隐私权政策 | 网站地图 | 联系我们

 互联网药品信息服务资格证书 | 卫生局审核意见通知书 | 药监局行政许可决定书 
电信与信息服务业务经营许可证 | 京ICP证070259号 | 京ICP备09068478号

Copyright © 2009 Elsevier.  All Rights Reserved.  爱思唯尔版权所有