索利那新与坦索罗辛口服控释吸收系统(TOCAS)组成单一片剂联合治疗男性下尿路症状:随机对照NEPTUNE试验的疗效和安全性结果。
Background
Storage symptoms are particularly bothersome in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) but may not be adequately treated by α-blocker monotherapy.
Objective
To assess the efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of solifenacin and an oral controlled absorption system (OCAS) formulation of tamsulosin compared with placebo and compared with tamsulosin OCAS (TOCAS) monotherapy in men with moderate to severe storage symptoms and voiding symptoms.
Design, setting, and participants
A double-blind 12-wk phase 3 study in 1334 men with storage and voiding LUTS: total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥13, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) 4.0–12.0 ml/s, two or more urgency episodes per 24 h of Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale grade 3 or 4, and eight or more micturitions per 24 h.
Intervention
Patients were randomised to placebo, TOCAS 0.4 mg, FDC solifenacin 6 mg plus TOCAS 0.4 mg, or FDC solifenacin 9 mg plus TOCAS 0.4 mg.
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis
Primary efficacy end points were (1) total IPSS and (2) Total Urgency and Frequency Score (TUFS). An FDC met the success criteria if it demonstrated superiority compared with placebo and noninferiority compared with TOCAS for total IPSS, as well as superiority compared with TOCAS for TUFS.
Results and limitations
Reductions in total IPSS and TUFS were observed with both solifenacin 6 mg plus TOCAS (−7.0 and −8.1, respectively) and solifenacin 9 mg plus TOCAS (−6.5 and −7.6, respectively) compared with TOCAS (−6.2 and −6.7, respectively) and placebo (−5.4 and −4.4, respectively). Solifenacin 6 mg plus TOCAS met all prespecified success criteria for both primary end points, while solifenacin 9 mg plus TOCAS met success criteria compared with placebo but not compared with TOCAS. Both FDCs improved quality of life (QoL) measures and were well tolerated, with low incidences of acute urinary retention.
- 您可能感兴趣的文章
-